tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665598552477308153.post302542945551434887..comments2024-02-17T19:36:03.936+00:00Comments on male femme: Laurie Penny's masculinity survey.Jonathanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17147186679298442560noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665598552477308153.post-9557742686635081622012-10-16T13:22:00.547+01:002012-10-16T13:22:00.547+01:00Ah right, no worries then :)
I'll go and remo...Ah right, no worries then :)<br /><br />I'll go and remove your failed attempts now.Jonathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17147186679298442560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665598552477308153.post-39477923810918514812012-10-16T12:40:39.169+01:002012-10-16T12:40:39.169+01:00Hi Jonathan, the misunderstanding was due to blogs...Hi Jonathan, the misunderstanding was due to blogspot messed up. <br /><br />I deleted my 15 October 2012 07:32 post as I wanted to add quotation marks to 'women's clothing'. I then reposted at 07:40 the same day. I came back to your blog in the afternoon, and the post had disappeared. I wasnt sure if you had deleted the 07:40 comment or if there had been a software bug. I reposted in the afternoon, however that disappeared instantly, so I thought I had been blocked from commenting and my comment had gone into the spam bin.<br /><br />So I posted my 16 October 2012 03:08 'Im blocked? wtf, but ok I shall respect your wishes' comment, and found it appeared. A bit shocked by its appearance, I then suspected I had not actually been blocked, but that there had been a software foulup. <br /><br />So I reposted part (a copy and paste error) of my first 15 October 2012 07:32 comment, at 16 October 2012 03:10. Ive noticed without quotation marks around 'women's clothing' lol<br /><br />What a mixup, apologies.<br />Im not familiar with blogspot quirks, as I created my blog id on 15 Oct to comment on this piece and maybe blog myself.James eqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04143909370163055651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665598552477308153.post-17608600156044739072012-10-16T06:51:26.076+01:002012-10-16T06:51:26.076+01:00Hi James, thanks for your comment. Yes, probably y...Hi James, thanks for your comment. Yes, probably you're right, probably I'm worrying about nothing (re oppressive behaviour). I tend to do that ;)<br /><br />Incidentally, “<em>This comment has been removed by the author.</em>” means the author of the comment (i.e. you) not the author of the blog (i.e. me). Glad to see that you've let your comment stand this time. I actually receive them all, once posted, whether subsequently deleted or not.Jonathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17147186679298442560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665598552477308153.post-62583258492574218402012-10-16T03:10:30.362+01:002012-10-16T03:10:30.362+01:00(Men, too, but men mostly aren't sartorially v...<b>(Men, too, but men mostly aren't sartorially very interesting.) </b><br /><br />aint that the truth. the last 150yrs have been a barren age for westernised men's clothing (even victorian writers complained about it, hehe) <br /><br /><b>Sometimes, therefore, I worry about my looking being mistaken for oppressive behaviour. I need a big sign that says: "I'm looking at your clothes not your body. No, really!"<br /></b><br />i know you were 'femme clothing' in public.<br />my thinking is this; women notice that we are wearing women's clothing, and so take that into account. personally i look at their clothes, ive never had an objection yet - i think they automatically can tell because of how im dressed (currently i wear a a-line linen skirt over a linen trouser bloused at the ankles - im very lazy, still havent finshed making my underskirt) that im looking at the clothes.James eqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04143909370163055651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665598552477308153.post-59098737710179347782012-10-09T12:45:26.743+01:002012-10-09T12:45:26.743+01:00Thanks, Lynn. Are you going to answer them yoursel...Thanks, Lynn. Are you going to answer them yourself? :)Jonathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17147186679298442560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665598552477308153.post-79534075833951167612012-10-08T21:49:43.797+01:002012-10-08T21:49:43.797+01:00Interesting reading, thanks for the re-post.Interesting reading, thanks for the re-post.Lynn Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00876715474502367377noreply@blogger.com